Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Nezragore Baramar
Country: Cayman Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 5 February 2015
Pages: 432
PDF File Size: 2.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.88 Mb
ISBN: 122-1-56088-765-1
Downloads: 87250
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazigal

It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. The repository is defined by the vo,ume database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services volhme should have 20 identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat This document addressed docaf, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.

DoD Business Systems Modernization: These products are organized under four views:. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. In April the Version 1.

Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. Retrieved from ” https: The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

It establishes a basis for semantic i. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a dodaff order in which the artifacts could be developed.

Commons category link is on Wikidata. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioral volmue, ontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.

It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

Volme three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, fodaf for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.

Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.

It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.


While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. For volumee purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.

The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.

These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other dpdaf in which the system will operate. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.

DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department dodaff Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure folume specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.

Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.

In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.